CSRNYC

Home

CSR Sites, Free Alerts

News December 2007

News Oct.-Nov. 2007

News April-Sept. 2007

Issues by Industry

Apparel

Building and Construction

Communications-PR

Food and Beverage Issues

Jewelry, Metals, Mining

Oil and Gas

Toy Industry

Business Case for CSR

Building Brands

DQS India

EssTee - Thailand

Switcher - India

Yesim - Turkey

Environmental Strategy

Environmental Branding

Business and Ecology

Green Building - NYC

Pepsico

McDonalds

Financial Responsibility

Corporate Philanthropy

Ireland Peace Bond

Microfinance

SRI Responsible Investing

Shareholder Activism

Sharia-Shariat Finance

Human Rights, Workplace

Eileen Fisher Case

Gap Inc. Case

Tiffany & Co.

Workplace Laws

Kaiping (China) Case

Workplace Branding

China-Workplace Democracy

Social Accountability Int

Shopping for CSR

Alonovo

Standardized CSR Metrics

Assurance, Verification

Convergence of Standards

Wal-Mart's Reputation

Philosophical Base of CSR

Branding and CSR

Four Types of Ethics

Ethics: Applications

Utilitarianism in 2008

Ethical Issues - FAQs

What Form of CSR Is Best?

Gender Issues

Votes for Women 1920

Inez:Suffragist 1886-1916

Alice Paul and NWP

Roch 1998 - Take Up Song

Contact

Wal-Mart
Discussion Questions

1.       Wal-Mart has ranked high on Fortune’s annual Most Admired list. What is the trend?
2.        Many stakeholders have joined a campaign against the company. What is their main complaint?

3.        Has Wal-Mart addressed the main complaint of the campaigners?
4.
     
You are an account executive at Fleishman-Hillard and the Wal-Mart account was dropped on your desk. What would you advise the client?

5.      Toys R Us (TRU), a key competitor of Wal-Mart in the toy sector, is committed as a Signator to the SA8000 system, devoting substantial resources to audits and training of its suppliers and serving on the SA8000 Advisory Board.  Where TRU shares factories, Wal-Mart is a free rider.  Which firm do you think will benefit more from this asymmetry? How would you advise TRU to address the free rider problem?

Wal-Mart and Public Relations – 2002-2008

 

2002-2003. Wal-Mart has zigzagged in the 2003-2008 period as it has attempted to address a campaign against it by labor unions and other NGOs. The following discussion is based on a NY Times Article on Wal-Mart by Constance L. Hays in 2003.

 

Wal-Mart is driven by a low-cost model and has not spent much on public relations. That changed in 2002 when Wal-Mart started investing in "reputation research" and then attempted to address the bad news about itself that it uncovered. The consultant Wal-Mart chose first was Fleishman-Hillard, part of the Omnicom Group. Some of the issues that attracted negative notice to Wal-Mart were  hiring part-time workers, treatment of female employees, and resistance to organized labor. Other opponents include communities opposed to building Wal-Mart stores and manufacturers pressed to sell their goods to Wal-Mart at lowed prices.

 

So in 2003 Wal-Mart broadcast three ads nationwide that portray it as a great place to work, produced by GSD&M of Austin, Tex., also part of Omnicom.  Wal-Mart says its research, rather than a federal lawsuit by workers, prompted the ads. The lawsuit contends that women were often overlooked or ignored when it came time to promote cashiers and others to management positions. The negatives caught everyone's attention at the company's highest levels.

 

2006-2008. By 2008, Wal-Mart has been actively engaged on the environmental front and has made some improvements in worker benefits. The environmental improvements have contributed to lower costs. Worker benefits have been improved in a few specific such areas as training and health care, but the company says it has too many employees and too much a focus on low-cost products to be able to afford large increases in wages or benefits.

New content (c) 2007, 2008 by CSRNYC. This site is managed by John Tepper Marlin, CityEconomist.

Website powered by Network Solutions®

CSR News, Ideas, History, Comments