CSRNYC

Home

CSR Sites, Free Alerts

Definitions of CSR

News Jan-Mar 2008

News Oct.-Nov. 2007

News April-Sept. 2007

Issues by Industry

Agriculture

Apparel

Beer

Building and Construction

Communications-PR

Finance

Food and Beverage Issues

Jewelry, Metals, Mining

Office Products

Oil and Gas

Organic Food

Retailing

Toy Industry

CSR as a Brand Ingredient

Building Brands

Branding - Smith & Jones

DQS India

EssTee - Thailand

Switcher - India

Topkapi Iplik - Turkey

Wal-Mart's Reputation

Yesim - Turkey

Environmental Strategy

Environmental Branding

Business and Ecology

Rainforest Alliance

Green Building - NYC

Anheuser-Busch

Coca-Cola

Pepsico

McDonalds

Whole Foods

Financial Responsibility

Corporate Philanthropy

Ireland Peace Bond

Microfinance

SRI Responsible Investing

Shareholder Activism

Sharia-Shariat Finance

Human Rights, Workplace

Chiquita

Eileen Fisher Case

Gap Inc. Case

Tiffany & Co.

Workplace Laws

Workplace Branding

China-Workplace Democracy

Kaiping (China) Case

Social Accountability Int

Alice Tepper Marlin

Metrics - Consumers, SRI

Alonovo

Assurance, Verification

Convergence of Standards

ShoppingforaBetterWorld

Standardized CSR Metrics

Philosophical Base of CSR

Branding and CSR

Four Types of Ethics

Ethics: Applications

Utilitarianism in 2008

Ethical Issues - FAQs

What Form of CSR Is Best?

Gender Issues

Votes for Women 1920

Inez:Suffragist 1886-1916

Alice Paul and NWP

Roch 1998 - Take Up Song

Contact

Energy Stakeholders in New York City:

Report on Energy and Climate Change from Sierra Club NYC Group

Download report at www.beyondoilnyc.org.
Read an online version with links to all references at
http://www.nyc.sierraclub.org/ 

PlaNYC, New York City’s sustainability plan, talks about reducing our carbon emissions 30% by 2030.  However, climate change is accelerating and many scientists say we need to reduce emissions further and faster. These actions are politically possible. Opinion polls show that public support for global warming action is widespread but shallow, but when combined with concern about energy independence and higher prices, it becomes a top voter priority, even surpassing national security. 

Beside climate change, we must also respond to the parallel challenge of increasing energy price volatility.  World oil demand keeps rising, while world oil production will soon peak and go into permanent decline. That guarantees greater volatility in the price and supply of oil.  Even though its extensive public transit system makes NYC less vulnerable to oil price spikes than other cities, short-term consequences of higher prices may not be immediately obvious. (Fuel depletion is still not widely discussed, but it is no longer controversial, having been covered in the Wall Street Journal, Time magazine and CNN. It will be addressed at Regional Planning Association’s annual conference.)

How would a prolonged increase in oil prices affect trucks bringing groceries to supermarkets?  Winter heating fuel prices?  The earnings of restaurants and theaters dependent on tourists?  Budgets for fire, police, and sanitation services?  Would commuters still choose to drive into Manhattan, or would they flock to mass transit?  

Government sustainability initiatives may have greater success when framed as responses to energy volatility than to climate change.  In the short term, expanding capacity margins through energy conservation will make the City more resilient to volatility, while expediting PlaNYC initiatives.  In the long term, we need to push discussion far past PlaNYC’s current goals, and start building a post-petroleum economy now.

The good news is that a national project to make clean energy cheap can restore domestic manufacturing, create millions of jobs that can’t be outsourced, and stimulate the economy, while improving our quality of life and mitigating climate change. New York City’s leadership can help make such policy actions a reality, while ensuring a better future for our citizens. 

What's the next step for New York City? “Sustainable Energy Independence for NYC” argues that the most effective way to accelerate NYC’s response to both climate change and energy volatility is the formation of a City Energy Volatility Task Force.


Form a NYC Energy Volatility Task Force
  • form a Task Force to study potential impacts and mitigations of energy price and supply volatility – not currently considered within PlaNYC.
  • require consideration of energy volatility and future energy prices in all City agency budgeting and planning decisions, including PlaNYC revisions
  • universities, civic and advocacy groups and business organizations should form their own Task Forces
  • bottom-up voluntary sustainability actions should be accelerated simultaneously with top down incentives, mandates and legislation
Other report recommendationsTransportation:
  • implement congestion pricing
  • remove hidden subsidies for driving and parking cars
  • increase regular and express bus services
  • increase alternative fuel and electric vehicle fleets
  • implement electric streetcar and light rail systems, as in Vision 42
  • implement Auto Free NY plan to maximize use of subway and rail
  • build more intercity passenger and freight train capacity
  • restrict suburban sprawl
  • encourage urban infill development around mass transit access points
  • support and expand use of bicycles and pedicabs
Regional production:
  • include energy volatility and fuel depletion in New York City and State economic development policy
  • encourage production and procurement of regional farm products
  • support agricultural production within cities and suburbs
  • enable residents to find farming and gardening jobs
  • encourage schools to establish gardens on their facilities
  • open additional retail farmers markets, a wholesale farmers market, year-round public markets, and a regional product distribution center
  • explore entrepreneurial ways to make private land available to new agricultural workers
Energy efficient building:
  • increase mandates and incentives for energy efficiency retrofits
  • mandate energy efficiency standards for equipment
  • encourage solar heating systems
  • design buildings for maximum cost-efficient energy performance
  • discourage acceptance of relentless growth in personal electricity consumption
New York City and State energy policy:
  • set timetables for PlaNYC’s many good energy initiatives, especially the formation of an Energy Planning Board
  • expand net metering to 2 megawatts per site for all customer classes, 
    as in
     New Jersey
  • distribute smart meters/time-of-use meters, which enable users to choose less costly off-hours electricity
  • raise the New York State Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard to 30% reduction of 2006 electric and gas usage rates by 2015
  • update the State Energy Plan to account for energy volatility
Endorsing organizations as of Feb. 20, 2008:
Brooklyn Center for the Urban Environment http://www.bcue.org/ 
Earth Day NY 
http://www.earthdayny.org/ 
Nos Quedamos 
http://www.nosquedamos.org 
NY Solar Energy Industry Association  
http://www.nyseia.org/ 
vision42  
http://www.vision42.org/ 
SAVIA Associates International 
http://www.susaviation.com/ 

[Addendum: NYC Groups with an Interest in Energy Use, Not on the Endorsement List  
AIA/NY-COTE  Association for Energy Affordability, Inc  Bronx Council for Environmental Quality  Center for Economic and Environmental Partnership, Inc  CENYC  COEJL  Columbia University Earth Institute  CUNY Institute for Urban Systems (CIUS)  Earth Pledge Green Roofs Initiative  Green Worker Cooperatives  Hazon  ITAC  NY Building Congress  NYC Central Labor Council  NYC Environmental Justice Alliance  NYCCT Apartment House Institute  NYIRN  NYU Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems  PICCED  Sustainable South Bronx  The Cooper Union Center for Sustainable Engineering, Architecture and Art—Materials, Manufacturing and Minimalism (SEA2M3)  The New School Tishman Environment and Design Center  UPROSE  West Harlem Environmental Action, Inc (WE ACT)  Women's City Club of NY]
The Big Oil Companies
 
The original Big Seven
Oil Companies were:
  1. Standard Oil of New Jersey (Esso, then Exxon), which merged with Mobil to form ExxonMobil.
  2. Royal Dutch Shell (Anglo-Dutch)
  3. Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) (British). This later became Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), then British Petroleum, and then BP Amoco following a merger with Amoco (which in turn was formerly Standard Oil of Indiana). It is now known solely by the initials BP.
  4. Standard Oil Co. of New York ("Socony"). This later became Mobil, which merged with Exxon to form ExxonMobil.
  5. Standard Oil of California ("Socal"). This became Chevron, then, upon merging with Texaco, ChevronTexaco. It has since dropped the 'Texaco' suffix, returning to Chevron.
  6. Gulf Oil. In 1985 most of Gulf became part of Chevron, with smaller parts becoming part of BP, and Cumberland Farms, in what was at that time the largest merger in world history. A network of stations in the northeastern United States still bears this name.
  7. Texaco. Merged with Chevron in 2001. The merged company was known for a time as ChevronTexaco, but in 2005 it changed its name back to Chevron. Texaco remains as a Chevron brand name.

As of 2005, the four surviving companies are ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP, now members of the "supermajors" group.

The New Seven Sisters, identified by the Financial Times (March 11, 2007) as the most influential and mainly state-owned national oil and gas companies from countries outside the OECD (Pemex of Mexico is excluded):

  1. Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia, formerly Aramco
  2. JSC Gazprom, Russia
  3. CNPC, China
  4. NIOC, Iran
  5. PDVSA, Venezuela
  6. Petrobras, Brazil
  7. Petronas, Malaysia

 

New content (c) 2007, 2008 by CSRNYC. This site is managed by John Tepper Marlin, CityEconomist.

Website powered by Network Solutions®

CSR News, Ideas, History, Comments